Putting a Face on Theatre
Ten Reasons to Not Use Unlicensed Music In Theater
Recently, I started a small music publishing business. It’s a unique model. We don’t try to sell music to producers of commercials, television and video games. We sell to live theaters that need “music cues” as incidental music for their productions, filling in a gap in rights-cleared music that nobody else seemed willing or ready to tackle. I had a slight advantage, since my husband has hours and hours of music he has written for all sorts of shows, and owns all the rights.
The truth that is seldom voiced is this: If a theater, any theater, from school play to Broadway, uses music they have downloaded or pulled from CDs, they are violating copyright laws if they didn’t get permission to play it in public during a performance. My site provides legal performance licenses for our music. Do I bring up the issue of copyright compliance? Will they get defensive, or feel like their artistic choices are being curtailed? It’s something I thought long and hard about, and in the final analysis, my choice was to get informed about the issue, but not be the one to bring it up. I don’t want to seem to be threatening my potential customers with legal penalties in order to get their business. But the threat is already there, and a lot of them already know that, and they also know it’s wrong to use an artist’s work without permission. Once I sense people realize that I am on their side, and I am offering a tool that protects them, they start asking questions about copyright and clearance issues. In many cases, they have not been asking anyone, rather like someone with a little lump who doesn’t want to know what it is so they won’t go to a doctor.
So I’ve made myself informed. I’ve spoken with ASCAP and BMI, university compliance officers, HR professionals, theater insurance companies, theater board members, artistic and managing directors and a terrific theater and copyright attorney. I have learned why you don’t want to use unlicensed music in a theater production.
Comment
Comment by Sonya Joseph on March 1, 2011 at 9:09am Thanks Rich, I'm actually quite stunned at the number and scale of questions I've been getting--I've started discussions in other groups as well and yes, it is a discussion that needs to be had. I think I'll pursue starting a scheduled chat to answer questions on this issue. I don't in any way consider you to be argumentative--I am appreciative that you are asking hard questions that need answering.
As far as derivative work goes, it's very tricky. There's a lot of precedent out there going BOTH ways. Where the judge rules it's far enough away from the original work to be considered original BUT there are just as many cases where the judge rules that it is a copyright infringement. The rules don't seem to be hard and fast here which puts you on very uncertain ground.
Within the music industry, particularly in rap, there is the practice of "sampling" a piece of music. It's an extremely controversial issue right now. There was a case in 1924 where a judge decided that four bars of music was not a copyright infringement and that is used as a measuring stick by some. However the "four bars rule" is not law, it is merely precedent. Very risky. In fact the law itself reads "may be considered a breach". Which means any use, however small, should be seriously considered.
Comment by Rich Dionne on March 1, 2011 at 8:47am Sonya,
Since you're talking to your attorney anyway...how does the idea of "derivative work" play into all of this? My understanding is that "fair use" comes into play when the use of a work is "derivative" of the original work. Since we might be using 15 seconds of a particular piece of music in a way that is different than its originally intended use--to comment on the music itself, and to make comment on action onstage--couldn't this be considered "derivative"?
It sounds like I'm trying to cut down your argument, but I'm not--I think this is an important discussion to have, and I'm just trying to work through what I've been given to understand...
Rich
Comment by Sonya Joseph on February 28, 2011 at 3:22pm Hi Rich,
Thanks, please do check out the site.
Yes, there are a lot of misconceptions surrounding the term "Fair Use". I'm actually going to consult our fantastic entertainment and copyright attorney, Gordon Firemark on this but here's what I know off the top of my head.
1) Doesn't matter if it's non-profit, even if you aren't charging money. If it's for the public in any form it's a copyright infringement. Now a performance within the confines of a class setting is "fair use" but if the parents are invited it's a public performance. Even if no money changes hands.
2) In actual fact, if you are using a small piece of music, this is a very particular copyright infringement that holds the exact same penalty. It constitutes a change of the material and is also prohibited.
3) It is entirely up to the artist and whomever he or she has conferred rights to (publisher, manager, etc) to make decisions about how the music is marketed or not marketed and you don't have any right to enter into the equation.
Comment by Rich Dionne on February 28, 2011 at 1:58pm Sonya,
First, let me say that I think the service you're providing is a fantastic idea. I haven't had a moment to check out your site, but I hope to soon. Also, it's worth saying that I'm not at all interested in "stealing" another artist's work, or finding a way to take money our of someone's pocket--all artists deserve compensation for their intellectual property.
I did want to ask about your ten points and the concept of "fair use," which I have always understood to cover the use of incidental music during a production. My understanding suggests that because
1) (Usually) the music is being used for a non-profit production
2) (Generally) the amount of music from the original track is relatively small compared to the total length of the track
3) The use of the music on stage would not generally speaking detract from the marketability of a track or album (i.e., people would not choose *not* to by an album because you've used a portion of a track in production)
the use of this music is permitted without obtaining permission.
I'm prepared to be wrong--and I'd very much like to know if I am!--but I'm not sure how or why the "fair use" exemption doesn't apply. Can you provide more information?
Comment by Scott Bloom on February 28, 2011 at 7:46am
Comment by Sonya Joseph on February 28, 2011 at 7:00am Hey Joe,
I forgot to mention that you only pay for the public performance license--NOT the music itself. So if you were to download 18 cues during your rehearsal period but in tech you found you only needed to use 10 of them, you'd only be charged for the cues that you use.
Comment by Sonya Joseph on February 27, 2011 at 2:48pm Hey Joe,
So glad you liked the site. The prices are on a sliding scale based on the size and scale of the theater. For example a little community youth theater that did a show with 6 cues for three nights it was $50 total. If a big LORT house wanted the same cues for a three week run it would probably be ten times that--of course LORT houses are pretty great about hiring composers so that doesn't come up often. And if you are buying as an organization rather than as an individual, you can get a membership at $240 a year (and yes, you can make monthly payments) and you can use as much as you want and we guarantee the clearances.
Comment by Joe Griffin on February 27, 2011 at 11:46am Fascinating stuff, Sonya. It's amazing how many companies either think they're covered or just don't give it any thought.
The music on the library sounds good, and the layout seems cool. Track previews are clean and easy. I'd be interested to know how much each piece costs to license.
Comment by Sonya Joseph on February 27, 2011 at 8:51am Hi Scott,
Yes, membership in AACT (we love them) does offer great ASCAP discounts for pre-show music but if it's during the duration of the play, you are not covered by ASCAP and that's the arena where I'm trying to help protect people.
Regardless of how difficult it is to get clearances, it still has to be done. MUCH more difficult problems arise if you don't do it and get caught!
That being said, give www.musicues.com a listen.
Comment by Scott Bloom on February 27, 2011 at 8:44am It's a very tricky issue to deal with because so many artists simply don't respond to requests for permission, or simply can't be bothered with something as trivial as a small theatre production. The other issue is with recorded music rights. Even if you get the artist's permission, there are a string of other people and/or corporations involved in the making of a recording, and they are all supposed to get royalties also.Using a published recording requires permission from both the artist and the recording company or their representative, usually ASCAP.
By the way, when it comes to pre-show or intermission lobby music, members of the AACT (American Association of Community Theatre) get huge discounts on ASCAP contracts. If a community theatre, (or even a small professional company,) doesn't have a license, they should. Membership in AACT pays for itself right there.
Start Your FREE Subscription to Stage Directions Today!
SD covers everything from backstage to box office--performance to production and is filled with practical tips and information you need to stay on top of theatre trends.Start getting your own copy today!
Theatreface is the networking site for professional, educational and community theatre brought to you by Stage Directions Magazine.
© 2013 Created by Jacob Coakley.
You need to be a member of TheatreFace to add comments!
Join TheatreFace