Putting a Face on Theatre
As part of my on going detailing of mounting The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee I thought I would bring up a piece of paperwork that I have a love hate relationship with... and that is an audio system's signal path visualized: a block diagram.
When I started in audio, this was the piece of paperwork I believed absolutely necessary to have or create when configuring or hooking up a system. Of course, when I started in audio, a typical block diagram looked like this:
(Diagram borrowed from http://www.d.umn.edu/~mharvey/th1551blockdiagram.html)
Not always hand drafted, but with basic components, and the largest mixer I ever had to deal with, having only 24 input channels.
From there, as the theatre I worked in grew, we added a few more bells and whistles as speaker options and placement throughout the theatre, and the block diagram expanded to something like this:
And then changed even more, as the audio components changed with technology: the musicals being produced on a regional and eventually educational level up-scaled exponentially, playback became more complex and eventually, digital consoles and signal processing were a part of the mix.
As I moved away from my early stomping grounds, I found that a lot of other designers, engineers and theatres didn't have/use /or create block diagrams for their systems and projects beyond (in some cases) beyond the initial installation blue prints. I was horrified, but I soon came to see why others didn't embrace/make use of the block diagram... and that is, quite simply, it's a really hard thing to create in a large, complex, and/or digital system.
I still value the format of the block diagram - but now working in a space with a DSP controlling the main system, multiple consoles in the front of house position one or more of which is digital, sixteen or more channels of playback in addition to microphones, effects units, etc. etc. the list goes on. The idea behind a block diagram is a simple visual of a system - but with complicated parts and multiple channels, you end up with something not easy to read:
I simply have found I don't know how to draft all of that effectively in to a single piece of paperwork that has a legible font size, or even on multiple pieces of paper. The compromise I've made in the short term is an overall system diagram that leaves out a lot of the details - showing AD/DA converters, consoles, and the system system processing, with secondary diagrams with input channels, etc. This isn't the perfect solution - I find that the usefulness of multiple pages to a single "visual" document is limited. A charted hook-up sheet effectively does the same thing, and doesn't require drafting.
I am still working towards the perfect solution. And you'll be the first to know (when and if) I find it...
Views: 1646
Tags: audio, audio-set-up, block-diagram, drafting, gear, live-audio, musicals, signal, signal-flow, spelling-bee
Comment
Comment by Richelle Thompson on September 25, 2012 at 9:27am Thanks Erich and Richard - some good thoughts and great resources.
Cheers,
~R
Comment by Erich Friend on September 24, 2012 at 10:09am The key to clarity in block diagrams is in minimizing the number of places that wires (lines) cross each-other, and in keeping most of the signal flow consistently from left to right. Labeling inputs and outputs in a consistent manner so that it is always clear whether you mean mic, line, video, data, etc., is helpful if you ever have to rebuild the system or rely on someone else to troubleshoot it.
If there is space, or you can show a graphic representation of each connection, then using symbols or text abbreviations for each connector type (XLR, TRS, RCA, RJ45, screw, etc.) can help to define the connections better.
Try not to constrain yourself to thinking in terms of 8 1/2 x 11 paper. Make each block as big as is necessary to read it, 3/32" tall text, minimum, being a good goal to strive towards in the finished document. Large format printers are available at most office supply or document reproduction services, so if you need 24x36 or 30x42 paper to make the print, so be it. If your drawing exceeds 30x42 size, then you may have to consider segmenting it horizontally or vertically to fit on each sheet. If you do this, it helps to plot all the segments at the same scale so that your can abut them later and clearly see the signal flow from sheet-to-sheet.
If a certain item needs more detail, just provide a supplementary 'break-out' drawing to do that.
Adding wire tags that show the type of cable and/or it's ID number can me helpful, too. A consistent system of enumeration can really help in troubleshooting. I use a system where Mic cables all start with 'M', Line with 'L', Video with 'V', Speaker with 'S', Intercom with 'IC', Modulated Radio/TV signals with 'RF", and Data / Control with 'D'. The cable numbers then start with 101 for the first segment, then as they advance through any signal processing, switches, or relays they advance by 100 to the next level (101 becomes 201, becomes 301, etc.). If a cable is spliced or splits at a terminal block, then the number stays the same and gets a suffix -A, -B, -C. etc. A typical wire tag might be: M202A or S301B.
Understand that a wiring diagram need only show a line per signal path, where a schematic diagram may show the individual conductors in a cable (red +, black -, Shield, etc.). A large Wiring Diagram can become too busy if schematic level connection information is included at each interface point. This is a good place for break-out diagrams to show typical wiring for each connector type.
Another graphic that can help on wiring diagrams is to use a heavy line type to show a perimeter around all the items at a particular physical location. This helps one see the range of cables that interconnect between various equipment sites like the Stage Manager's Console, Amplifier Rack(s), Aux Rack(s) at the mix position, and other major junction boxes that house connector panels.
If you have individual inlet or outlet plates, showing the symbol that is used on the floor plan adjacent to the connector symbol can help to correlate the physical plan to the electronic schematic.
The USITT standard documents referred to by Richard Ingraham are a very good source of examples.
I would urge anyone that hasn't done so, to read the USITT Student Drafting Guidelines about system block diagrams. It is well thought out and does a resonable job of showing what information is really important to be put on the block diagram and what information is much more effective on a hook up or excel sheet like document showing what plugs into what.
http://ww4.usitt.org/commissions/sound/Sound_Comm_Graphics_Project_...
Typically I show only the basic signal flow on the block diagram and the details about what cable run is what and what function each connection serves is all in the hook up. Sometimes I use Excel for simple projects but on larger projects, paticularly when there are shop orders and rentals involved I will use Stage Research's ShowBuilder software for the hook up part of the paperwork.
Because I don't have regular access to a large format printer, I often break my signal diagrams down into smaller pieces so they will print neatly and clearly onto standard 8.5 x 11 sheets of paper or sometimes legal size paper.
There are several examples on my web site.
http://www.rbicompaudio.20m.com/past_projects.html
Hope some find that useful.
Theatreface is the networking site for professional, educational and community theatre brought to you by Stage Directions Magazine.
84 members
64 members
357 members
Start Your FREE Subscription to Stage Directions Today!
SD covers everything from backstage to box office--performance to production and is filled with practical tips and information you need to stay on top of theatre trends.Start getting your own copy today!
© 2015 Created by Stage Directions.
You need to be a member of TheatreFace to add comments!
Join TheatreFace